Subject: Re: 64-bit daddr_t problems with libsa
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/31/2003 01:03:55
> Also, the "static char ebuf[xx];" will go in the BSS, so it's size isn't
> really important...
Not in that case, but the x86 'boot' program is curently 
constrained to have code + data + bss + stack less that 64k.
 I've finally fixed dosboot, so am doing some final testing
of versions of dosboot and biosboot that have an entire 128k
to play with (+ heap).
These might break the build soon :-)
David Laight: email@example.com