Subject: Re: 64-bit daddr_t problems with libsa
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
Date: 01/31/2003 11:52:05
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 03:24:05PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > On pmax however, we're still 40 bytes over...
> > This change to strerror.c might win that back.
> > I'll commit it now if you want...
> Right, so why does the primary loader need strerror() again? :-)
At least pmax and alpha don't need strerror() in the first stage.
Also, the "static char ebuf[xx];" will go in the BSS, so it's size isn't
Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD Support and Service: http://www.wasabisystems.com/