Subject: Re: COMPAT_MACH and lwp
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/26/2003 20:30:05
> Parent is sleeping, awaiting for the child to be ready, and I have no idea
> where the child is. It is supposed to be runnable, but according to TIME, it
> has nor run.
Ok, I fixed it. The problem was that it's the parent responsability to
make the child lwp runnable. So this code is mandatory after using
mctc.mctc_lwp->l_stat = LSRUN;
Why newlwp does not do it for us? It could be disabled by a flag if it
is necessary. The current scheme encourage code duplication.
COMPAT_MACH/COMPAT_DARWIN seems fixed wrt to lwp, I beleive we reached
the same level of functionnality we had before SA merge.
Pas de processeur Intel, pas de logiciels Microsoft:
Des programmes sains dans un ordinateur sain.