Subject: Re: Using common code for alternate path checks
To: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@netbsd.org>
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/09/2002 22:50:06
> It would make LKMs a bit more painful. I'd say if it's ain't broken,
> don't fix it. Also, there is different issue that not all the emuls
> really would use all the functions provided by compat_file.c, so
> it would perhaps bring a bit more unnecessary code into custom
> kernels.
You can ifdef out anything that you don't use. Of course theses function
would not go in a module, but I'm not sure it matters: it's not likely
that you will need to change theses functions: they are just plain
stubs.
However it would have been nice to have this discussion when I proposed
the change last week.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Quel est le meilleur moyen d'accelerer un PC?
- 9,81 m/s^2
manu@netbsd.org