-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> You mean like, perhaps, a system already on the edge of collapse where
> the delays will make the collapse worse, as has already been explained
> by others?

Yes, like that.  :)

Ok, you and others, even with the characteristic "I'm right, you're
wrong" bluntness, have convinced me it is just an overall bad idea.
I did't consider the httpd example you gave, but you're right, it
could harm that situation.

- --Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
Comment: See http://www.flame.org/~explorer/pgp for my keys

iD8DBQE98Ttal6Nz7kJWYWYRAnnTAJ9vcEZIQN7T9dj56E6YsFI84hZ3EQCeINt+
nU0ZrRsub0eJs63M7CA5CDw=
=hYpw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----