On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 09:43:43PM +0900, Bang Jun-Young wrote:
> 
> > With RelCache all conflicts are already resolved, so there's no need
> > to maintain conflicts list like Red Hat prelink.
> 
> You: ELF semantics prevent us from using one cache file per shared library.
> I: I don't think so.

You should read my "RelCache vs. Red Hat prelink".

> You: yes, but not using one cache file per shared library works too.

It's faster, easy to port, a lot simpler & smaller, etc. Why do you
want a complicated, not easy to port, bigger, and slower one?

Jun-Young

-- 
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung@netbsd.org>