> Is there a particular reason why FreeBSD emulation uses native sys_acct
> instead of a freebsd_sys_acct that would check files in /emul/freebsd?

Same question for swapon(2), utimes(2), and undelete(2).

More thoughts: COMPAT_DARWIN is going to use FreeBSD functions for all
file related system calls. Theses are just plain native NetBSD plus a
check in /emul/{freebsd|darwin|whatever}. 

Maybe we could rename them as just bsd_<the system call name> and move
everything from compat/freebsd/freebsd_file.c to
compat/common/bsd_file.c?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus.  Cette signature vous est fournie telle quelle, sans 
aucune garantie de fonctionnement. En la lisant, vous acceptez 
implicitement tous les degats qu'elle pourrait causer, materiellement 
ou logiciellement.                                manu@netbsd.org