Note the 'code' as passed to systrace_enter() is already masked,
and thus guaranteed to be lower than nsysent for given emulation.
Yes, i've been looking on the problem reported on openbsd-bugs;
we are not vulnerable.

Jaromir

Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> 	it looks to me that, if __HAVE_MINIMAL_EMUL is defined,
> 	we can't perform bound checks on syscall number.  am i correct?
> 	if so, does it make sense to move e_nsysent out of #ifndef
> 	__HAVE_MINIMAL_EMUL?  it is needed for systrace and such.
> 	(some of sys/compat/*/*exec.c, such as sunos, does not have #ifndef
> 	clause, so it can't be compiled with __HAVE_MINIMAL_EMUL defined)
> 
> itojun
> 


-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.org/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-