Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:32:16PM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > Isn't there a flag field somewhere? These flags don't really need more
> > than one bit each.
> 
> They're actually counters which are decremented each time, so the
> next N fork/exec's get stopped.

Why you need next N stopped? I think it's perfectly OK
to have it just a flag - 'stop child after fork' and 'stop after exec'.
No need for counter.

Jaromir 
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>            http://www.NetBSD.org/
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-