Subject: Re: ntohl usage in Apple UFS code
To: Frank van der Linden <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/30/2002 08:23:49
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:09:02AM +0200, Frank van der Linden wrote:

 > Secondly, is Apple UFS defined to be big endian? If not, these
 > need to be conditional like the rest of the FFS swap code.

Yes, I'm pretty sure Apple UFS is always big-endian.  (NeXT's UFS
was like this, too .. big-endian on NeXTSTEP for x86.)

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>