Subject: Re: Weird munmap(2) semantic
To: Chuck Cranor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Charles M. Hannum <email@example.com>
Date: 09/27/2002 19:09:15
> sounds like a good idea. i poked at CVS, and it looks like
> it got removed from the old VM also when fvdl did the lite2
> merge. see lines 460 and 467 of:
Okay, I removed it.
However, I'm going to have to do more work on dlclose(3), because it's
just possible, especially on platforms where there is a large gap,
that something else could legitimately have been mapped in the hole.