Subject: Re: PAM
To: None <>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/25/2002 11:05:37
>>     [...].  An arguably better way would be to have the calls affect
>>     "the process on the other end of this pipe".
> This won't work.  There can be zero to N processes at the end of a
> pipe.

This is a specious objection; I didn't mention it on the assumption
that anyone on tech-kern would be able to see how easy it'd be to have
the call fail unless there is exactly one such process.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B