Subject: Re: PAM
To: NetBSD Kernel Technical Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: Ken Hornstein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/24/2002 17:05:20
>> How do I do this via a message-passing interface?
>Well, first you fix the API. Probably this means adding a new set of
>system calls and proc-level data structures, and then fixing whatever in
>the other side of the AFS implementation makes use of these data.
Unfortunately, some of us live in the real world. If the solution is to
re-write half of AFS, or simply use PAM, which one do you think I would
pick? (I already know what YOU would pick, so you don't need to tell me).