Subject: Re: Firmware and kernel image compression
To: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
Date: 09/17/2002 19:04:12
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:14:17 +0100
From: David Laight <email@example.com>
| However a 'cleanroom' implementation has to be done from
| documentation that is in the public domain (or some such
| definition). Using GPL source code isn't...
It wouldn't be a cleanroom implementation, but that doesn't mean it
would breach copyright.
eg: if I were to visit the Louvre, see a painting of a woman with an
enigmatic smile, and think "a painting like that might be a great thing
to give to the world", and race home and paint one - the result is not
necessarily a copy of the Mona Lisa - though it could be. Whether it
is or not turns out to be a question of fact to decide in each case.
On the other hand, if I had never seen the painting (or a reproduction of
it), then no matter what my effort ended up looking like, it could not be
That's why people like clean room implementations - not because it is
required for copyright purposes, but because it makes it absolutely clear
that there cannot be a copyright issue.