Subject: Re: rnd_add_uint32()
To: enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/21/2002 17:13:30
>> - add the specified number to entropy pool
>> by calling it on each iteration i was trying to do the latter,
>> since there's no meaningful random value outside of the loop.
>Is the value of interrupt status register so random? I wonder how
>much it helps if stirring the pool with isr (in addition to the
>timestamp value itself, which is already done).
i agree passing isr is not that meaningful.
maybe
rnd_add_timestamp(rndresource_element_t *)
is what we need for network device interrupts.
itojun