On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:10:43PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:08:38PM +1200, Gregory McGarry wrote:
> 
>  > In terms of hardware handshake, then perhaps it isn't.  In the context
>  > of delay() and DELAY() doing the same thing, then it doesn't make
>  > sense to me to have both.  Is that what you meant?
> 
> You're right, it doesn't make sense to have both, but I'm not convinced
> that DELAY() is the right one :-)

The way I recall it is that DELAY() is for constant (maybe small?)
times, and delay() is the "general-purpose" delay function.

Simon.
--
Simon Burge                                   <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Development, Support and Service:   http://www.wasabisystems.com/