Jason R Thorpe wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:08:38PM +1200, Gregory McGarry wrote:
> 
>  > In terms of hardware handshake, then perhaps it isn't.  In the context
>  > of delay() and DELAY() doing the same thing, then it doesn't make
>  > sense to me to have both.  Is that what you meant?
> 
> You're right, it doesn't make sense to have both, but I'm not convinced
> that DELAY() is the right one :-)

FreeBSD has chosen DELAY().

	-- Gregory McGarry <g.mcgarry@ieee.org>