>>>>> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:57:55 +0900 (JST),
	Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> said:

> This shouldn't be difficult to implement, either, since it's just
> the same thing as mlock(2), right?

mlock(2) takes virtual address range as its argument, but SHM_LOCK
takes a (shm identifier of) memory object as its argument.
So, there is some difference.
--
soda