Subject: Re: Supporting sector size != DEV_BSIZE
To: Trevin Beattie <trevin@xmission.com>
From: Konrad Schroder <perseant@hhhh.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 06/28/2002 18:35:01
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Trevin Beattie wrote:

> byte->block conversion named btodb() and dbtob().  HOWEVER, these names are
> already defined in <machine>/param.h in terms of DEV_BSIZE, and they don't

Why don't you generate your patch using DB for DEV_BSIZE and SEC for
sectors?

I still maintain that the patch would be smaller if you let "db" stand
for DEV_BSIZE but I can verify that much more easily once I have a
macroized patch to run sed on :^)
						Konrad Schroder
						perseant@hhhh.org