> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:01:46PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > > Maybe an I/O scheduler makes sense as a solution to this problem?  Or
> > > > would that be Too Much Effort?  If so, another solution might be to
>
> I think that an i/o scheduler is the long-term solution to this problem.
> It won't make 1.6 (it's WAY too late for that), but it's what we should
> do.
>
WAIT?!

do you mean final 1.6 will be left as is now? with these stalls, swapouts
etc?