Subject: Re: arc4random(9)
To: None <>
From: None <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/29/2002 15:59:27
>It seems to me that the *right* thing to do would be to persuade the other
>BSD camps to replace arc4random() with an RC4-based random() implementation.
>It is not *always* wrong to do things better and try to persuade the other
>guys to see the light, after all.

	go ahead.  i won't stop you from persuading others.  i have other
	important things to do than "this name is better" battle.