Subject: Re: arc4random(9)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 05/29/2002 15:59:27
>It seems to me that the *right* thing to do would be to persuade the other
>BSD camps to replace arc4random() with an RC4-based random() implementation.
>It is not *always* wrong to do things better and try to persuade the other
>guys to see the light, after all.
go ahead. i won't stop you from persuading others. i have other
important things to do than "this name is better" battle.