Subject: Re: nesting simple_lock and spl*?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/26/2002 23:23:17
> > good - but I think I saw a different Unix where it did :-(
> Right, this is a different between NetBSD and other Unix systems.
Yes, it always worried me that something I called between
splabc() and splx() might enable my interrupt while trying
to block a low priority one.
Was only when I found an spl0() call in the bowels of the
scheduler I realised this might happen.
(sort of similar to finding my ethernet tx routine being
called from within the timer interrupt.)
David Laight: email@example.com