Subject: Re: Accounting for differences in physical memory performance
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/23/2002 07:16:11
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:48:59AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > > Cool! There's a similar possibility of suboptimal RAM layout on the =
amiga
> > > port, do you happen to know if that facility's used there too?
> >
> > Looks like on the Amiga, the facility is only used to keep the Zorro-II
> > accessible RAM from being allocated early. (The i386 port does the same
> > thing for ISA-accessible memory.)
>=20
> I think that's enough (at least it is on my A2k... or would be, if I
> decided to upgrade it from 1.1 ;-)
I considered sorting the memory by Amiga memory list priority, but somebody
explained to me that NetBSD could not really make use of this information;
once a page is used, it is used. Is this not true?
-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE87HsaPCRcZ/VMtk4RAmzmAJ4nD1M2eJ6QnlwQjfB/hR3iI8BHQQCfdaLM
aUH21vLC/yuZIthLGQc4xGI=
=u4d/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--