Subject: Re: 160MB/s (was Re: scsibus capabilities.)
To: Matthew Jacob <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/20/2002 19:26:28
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:17:56PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 08:20:26AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:01:10PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > re-porting the FreeBSD AHC driver should not require chip docs..... :-)
> > > >
> > > > The current FreeBSD ahc driver is currently somewhat split up for
> > > > OS-independent and OS-dependent bits, too.
> > >
> > > Yes, but it's really tied to CAM and doesn't fit too well with our scsi layer.
> > > Doing a proper port would require a few changes to the OS-independant
> > > driver part, and for this I needs adaptec docs (from what I remember when
> > > I looked at this stuff some months ago).
> > No- it's not tied to CAM anymore since Justin did a fair job of
> > reaarchitecting it into OS and core portions so it'd run on Linux && FreeBSD.
> There are CAM bits in the core portion. It's possible that the linux
> version includes a CAM emulation, but as the linux version is GPL'd we
> can't use it.
Hum, our in-tree version has the same copyrigth, so this should be OK to use.
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>