Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: Change MACHINE_ARCH "arm" to "armel"?
To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/20/2002 11:59:59
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 10:08:45PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 11:02:13PM -0400, mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:
>=20
> > will this confuse config.guess for piles of autoconf'ed 3rd party
> > packages?
>=20
> Actually, it certainly could. Perhaps we should leave the little
> endian version as just "arm".
Is this independent of where we pack common code? I didn't follow closely,
but afair, deciding how to make mips dtrt needed some time.
Other than that, arm vs. armbe is fine for me.
Regards,
-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE86MkfPCRcZ/VMtk4RAheLAKCFisqzmwfyYjWKk1b8ZmDqPuPhFgCeNhNz
fyBNFSE+hv6H21Hwu/VYZrk=
=YkAF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--