Subject: Re: Increasing SHMMAXPGS
To: None <>
From: David Laight <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/19/2002 18:46:05
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Yes. SHMMAXPGS should be nuked from orbit -- it should dynamically
> size itself. (We should also somehow garbage collect segments that are
> no longer associated with running processes.)

I have a horrid wisper of a memory that they are required to
stay lurking....
OTOH I've never actually used them - mmaped /dev/null shared...


David Laight: