Subject: Re: 160MB/s (was Re: scsibus capabilities.)
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 05/17/2002 12:56:05
[ On Friday, May 17, 2002 at 08:20:26 (-0700), Matthew Jacob wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: 160MB/s (was Re: scsibus capabilities.)
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:14:08PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:01:10PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > >
> > > > re-porting the FreeBSD AHC driver should not require chip docs..... :-)
> > >
> > > The current FreeBSD ahc driver is currently somewhat split up for
> > > OS-independent and OS-dependent bits, too.
> > Yes, but it's really tied to CAM and doesn't fit too well with our scsi layer.
> > Doing a proper port would require a few changes to the OS-independant
> > driver part, and for this I needs adaptec docs (from what I remember when
> > I looked at this stuff some months ago).
> No- it's not tied to CAM anymore since Justin did a fair job of
> reaarchitecting it into OS and core portions so it'd run on Linux && FreeBSD.
and of course there's already an example port of an earlier version to
NetBSD too..... :-)
You can do it! I know you can! :-)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>