On Monday, 13 May 2002 at 23:05:32 -0600, Rick Kelly wrote:
> Jason R Thorpe said:
>
>> There is a clear separation of the two sets of functionality.
>>
>> Now, take a look at the code in NetBSD.  You'll see a similar separation
>> of functionality ... UFS for the high-level Unix file system stuff, FFS
>> and LFS providing the on-disk storage support.
>
> Okay. So what is the fs with ACL support going to be called? If you remember,
> from a number of months ago, there is someone porting the ACL based stuff
> from FreeBSD to NetBSD.

It's called UFS in FreeBSD.  It wouldn't make any sense to call it
anything else in NetBSD.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers