der Mouse wrote:
> Yes, it should.  But since when has this become dogma strong enough to
> justify overriding a port's portmaster, and thereby presumably breaking
> that port until someone figures out how to fix the MI stuff, and does
> it? 

FWIW, AFAIK PCI stuff worked fine on sparc64 before ofppb/ofpci
was introduced. AFAIK ofppb/ofpci only provides convenient way
to match OF tree nodes and PCI devices, nothing more.

TRT is add necessary hooks to generic PCI mode, not inventing
new pseudobus.

Jaromir
-- 
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.NetBSD.org/Ports/i386/ps2.html
-=- We should be mindful of the potential goal, but as the tantric    -=-
-=- Buddhist masters say, ``You may notice during meditation that you -=-
-=- sometimes levitate or glow.   Do not let this distract you.''     -=-