> > Broke a lot of code that didn't use proper includes, thus assuming that
> > off_t parameters to lseek() and *truncate() where 32bit integers :-)
>
> This means that there should be no problem at all with large partitions, eg: larger than 200G, using FFS? Great to know... FFS seems to be slower than XFS though for whatever reason... LFS has been impressing, I have yet to discover if it also could handle very large partitions however
>
LFS is impressive on writes. not reads