Subject: Re: proposed re-work / unification of boot block installation
To: Izumi Tsutsui <email@example.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/01/2002 19:56:00
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 09:53:42PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
| I forgot to ask:
| In article <20020430200313.R3537@wasabisystems.com>
| email@example.com wrote:
| > | 1) Is it worth that native installboot for each port supports
| > | installation of bootstrap for ALL ports?
| > Yes, it is.
| Isn't it still worth to make non-native bootstrap
| supports optional (especially for install media) ?
| I'm afraid future MI installboot will become bigger and bigger.
This is a valid concern. However, I'll wait until it becomes an issue
before tackling it (there's other more pressing issues, at least in
the near term).
Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.wasabisystems.com
Luke Mewburn <email@example.com> http://www.netbsd.org
Wasabi Systems - NetBSD hackers for hire
NetBSD - the world's most portable UNIX-like operating system