Subject: Re: lazy mlock?
To: <>
From: David Laight <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/17/2002 09:25:09
> How would you say such a program should be "fixed"?

Well, making it a lot smaller - eg exec something that
only contains the daemon code once initialisation has
happened.  Also being careful of how much of libc gets
pulled into the (presumably) statically linked binary.


David Laight: