Subject: Re: lazy mlock?
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/17/2002 00:31:27
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 04:13:27PM -0700, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:48:32PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > If it isn't a silly question, why should ntpd 'lock down' any code at all?
> Because it is very sensitve to being able to react to a message. Making
> it wait to page in something will skew its results.
So will network delays, paging in U and/or P areas etc....
If latency is that important (and it were solaris or SVR4), I would
push a streams module onto the UDP? stream and respond from within
In any case, I presume that the active part of nptd could be 1
page each code, data, stack + U area (p + lwp)
David Laight: email@example.com