Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removal of brk()/sbrk().
To: None <email@example.com>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 02/28/2002 05:18:50
>>> What about programs that dump themselves for later restart (like
>>> emacs, TeX etc.)?
>> Sendmail used to do that with its config file,
> Nonsense. sendmail's fc file was a normal file, read/written like
> any other file, sendmail never did any undump nonsense.
No, but what sendmail did was pretty close in many respects. (The .fc
file was basically write(fd,&_etext,sbrk(0)-&_etext) - not dump/undump,
but definitely not a clean savefile format, and critically dependent on
the way the VM space was laid out. The mmap-based malloc mentioned
upthread would have broken it instantly.)
> The fc file was certainly sendmail version specific (it contained
> data which would only work with the same sendmail that produced it),
> but that's a different issue entirely.
Not only version specific, but build specific - if the next build
happens to reorder things in the data segment, or change the size of a
structure, an old fc file could be expected to misbehave horribly.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B