Subject: Re: USB structure rename
To: Christos Zoulas <>
From: Alfred Perlstein <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/19/2002 14:48:36
* Christos Zoulas <> [020219 14:36] wrote:
> In article <>,
> Alfred Perlstein <> wrote:
> >I plan on committing the following delta to FreeBSD:
> >
> >
> >
> >The idea is to rename the structure fields within the USB ioctl
> >range to match what's commonly used, basically the prefix is
> >added as necessary.
> >
> >The main reason this came about is the 'class' field in one
> >of the structures breaks including the file for c++ programs.
> >
> >There's two alternatives to the rename:
> No, the rename is good and matches general practice.

Great!  So I can count on NetBSD following suit with the rename?

Btw, we talked at the 'con right?

-Alfred Perlstein []
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: