Subject: Re: USB structure rename
To: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
From: Alfred Perlstein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/19/2002 14:48:36
* Christos Zoulas <email@example.com> [020219 14:36] wrote:
> In article <20020219213841.GR12136@elvis.mu.org>,
> Alfred Perlstein <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >I plan on committing the following delta to FreeBSD:
> >The idea is to rename the structure fields within the USB ioctl
> >range to match what's commonly used, basically the prefix is
> >added as necessary.
> >The main reason this came about is the 'class' field in one
> >of the structures breaks including the file for c++ programs.
> >There's two alternatives to the rename:
> No, the rename is good and matches general practice.
Great! So I can count on NetBSD following suit with the rename?
Btw, we talked at the 'con right?
-Alfred Perlstein [email@example.com]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/