Subject: Re: USB structure rename
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/19/2002 22:36:07
In article <20020219213841.GR12136@elvis.mu.org>,
Alfred Perlstein <email@example.com> wrote:
>I plan on committing the following delta to FreeBSD:
>The idea is to rename the structure fields within the USB ioctl
>range to match what's commonly used, basically the prefix is
>added as necessary.
>The main reason this came about is the 'class' field in one
>of the structures breaks including the file for c++ programs.
>There's two alternatives to the rename:
No, the rename is good and matches general practice.