In article <20020219213841.GR12136@elvis.mu.org>,
Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> wrote:
>I plan on committing the following delta to FreeBSD:
>
>http://www.mu.org/~bright/usb.diff
>
>The idea is to rename the structure fields within the USB ioctl
>range to match what's commonly used, basically the prefix is
>added as necessary.
>
>The main reason this came about is the 'class' field in one
>of the structures breaks including the file for c++ programs.
>
>There's two alternatives to the rename:

No, the rename is good and matches general practice.

christos