Subject: Re: RAW access to files
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
From: Arne H Juul <Arne.Juul@osl.fast.no>
Date: 12/12/2001 00:54:31
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:42:07PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > this is more often called "direct i/o" or "unbuffered i/o".
> > > it's on the list of things I want to add, but I haven't had time yet.
> > it would be really good! with support in common mpeg/divx players etc..
> > and with option in cp and dd
> Why do you think that "raw" I/O would be more efficient than the filesystem
> + buffer cache doing readahead?
Because that's what benchmarks and real production use of some
applications with and without direct io show :-) I don't think
"cp" is such a good example though, since you lose the readahead.
For some (typically database-like) apps it can be a pretty big boost.
Disclaimer: We've actually *measured* the performance difference
for our app only on FreeBSD, Windows, Solaris, and Linux, AFAIK.
Arne H Juul Mail: Arne.Juul@fast.no
System administrator Web: http://www.fast.no/
Fast Search & Transfer Phone: +47 7320 1219
Sverresgate 15, 7013 Trondheim Fax: +47 7320 1201