Subject: Re: nathan_sw and proc flags
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Gregory McGarry <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/08/2001 17:46:08
Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > In the non-SA world, the proc-dependent flags are inherited from
> > the parent in cpu_fork(). In the SA world, the flags are split
> > between LWP-specific and proc-specific. ISTM that current
> > implementations of cpu_fork() do ensure the inheritance of the
> > LWP-specific flags, but the proc-specific flags are not
> > initialised and usually filled with junk. The symptoms I saw
> > where corrupted page tables on NetBSD/hp300.
> I guess you mean this assignment:
> p2->p_md.md_flags = p1->p_md.md_flags;
Yep. Of course you cannot do that indiscriminantly.
> > Since cpu_fork() doesn't know whether it is handling a process
> > fork or an LWP fork, who is responsible for maintaing proc-specific
> > flags?
> Sounds like:
> * cpu_fork() needs to be renamed to cpu_lwp_fork().
> * A new cpu_proc_fork() needs to be added which would
> be called by uvm_proc_fork().
Sounds good to me.
-- Gregory McGarry <email@example.com>