Subject: Re: how to avoid re-ordering?
To: Luke Mewburn <>
From: enami tsugutomo <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 12/05/2001 14:27:17
Luke Mewburn <> writes:

> wouldn't it be better to mark the ocpl and ncpl arguments as
> `volatile' instead? does that solve the problem?

I don't think it make sense.  The problem here is a lack of barrier
between splxxx/splx and the code inside them, isn't it?