Subject: Re: c-style question
To: Simon Burge <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matt Thomas <email@example.com>
Date: 11/18/2001 20:57:37
At 03:13 PM 11/19/2001 +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
>In KNF, do we prefer either
>when cons_init is a function pointer?
I prefer the former since it makes it explicit that you are calling
a function pointer.
>Related is why in the above example we get an error in the later case
>but not the former. "cons_init" is a macro in <dev/cons.h>, but for
>some reason it doesn't get expanded in the first case. Any clue sticks
>available for something simple I might have overlooked?
I bet cons_init is defined as cons_init() which won't be expanded
on just a plain cons_init reference (the first case).