thorpej@wasabisystems.com ("Jason R Thorpe") writes:
> But even what you're suggesting wouldn't be "the right way".  Add +x to
> libc.so and then do "./libc.so".  This isn't really what you want, either.

Arguably that's a deficiency in sys_execve() then.

But in any case, it's a _whole_ lot better than allowing a malicious
user to cause any readable file to become unwritable (or, i guess, not
open()able for write, right?).


chris