Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org> writes:

> I only used "u_longlong_t" instead of "unsigned long long [int]",
> because the latter is less to type.
> 
> Would you rather I change pax so that:
> 	a) it uses unsigned long long instead of u_longlong_t, or
> 	b) fix the port with the uncommon definition for u_long_long ?

a), definitely.  BTW, since you're already relying on C99 library
features you might as well consider intmax_t, strtoimax() etc.


- Klaus