Subject: Re: types gone amuck (Re: CVS commit: basesrc/bin/pax)
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: Klaus Klein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/28/2001 13:55:33
Luke Mewburn <email@example.com> writes:
> I only used "u_longlong_t" instead of "unsigned long long [int]",
> because the latter is less to type.
> Would you rather I change pax so that:
> a) it uses unsigned long long instead of u_longlong_t, or
> b) fix the port with the uncommon definition for u_long_long ?
a), definitely. BTW, since you're already relying on C99 library
features you might as well consider intmax_t, strtoimax() etc.