Subject: Re: sys_sbrk()? sys_sstk()?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Klaus Klein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/17/2001 22:58:58
> We seem to have sys_sbrk() and sys_sstk() that don't seem to do
> anything. Why are we keeping them?
As both Perry and I observed quite a while ago, there doesn't seem to
be a compelling reason to do so. In fact, the amount of discussion
actually related to this particular question in the whole thread seems
to indicate this. :-)