Subject: Re: uvm_km_free() does not unloan implicitly?
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Martin J. Laubach <mjl@emsi.priv.at>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/11/2001 20:12:58
|  Yes, it does. I think I understand the reasons why it works this
|  way. It just surprised me at first. This way is okay, I don't think
|  it needs to be changed, it fits the intended use well.

  Perhaps it would be good to add the explanations to the manpages?
Just a thought...

	mjl