Subject: Re: uvm_km_free() does not unloan implicitly?
To: Chuck Cranor <email@example.com>
From: Jaromír <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/11/2001 20:17:10
Chuck Cranor wrote:
> does this match the behavior you are seeing now?
Yes, it does. I think I understand the reasons why it works this
way. It just surprised me at first. This way is okay, I don't think
it needs to be changed, it fits the intended use well.
Thanks for further explanation.
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
NetBSD - just plain best OS! -=*=- Got spare MCA cards or docs? Hand me them!