Subject: Re: uvm_km_free() does not unloan implicitly?
To: Chuck Cranor <>
From: Jaromír <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/11/2001 20:17:10
Chuck Cranor wrote:
> does this match the behavior you are seeing now?

Yes, it does. I think I understand the reasons why it works this
way. It just surprised me at first. This way is okay, I don't think
it needs to be changed, it fits the intended use well.

Thanks for further explanation.

Jaromir Dolecek <>
NetBSD - just plain best OS! -=*=- Got spare MCA cards or docs? Hand me them!