On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 18:55, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> 
>  - changing the errno-list verbiage to say "if you get this error,
> this is what it may mean" instead of the (misleading) "foo(2) fails
> if..." text.

Yes, that would be good.  It should be an explanation of what the values
mean, not an exact and precise list of the particular failure modes of
the current implementation.