Subject: re: Generic Properties
To: None <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/01/2001 10:36:38
* I think if you're going to pursue this, you're really best doing it
as "the better sysctl" and include the features that are desired,
rather than doing it as "database plus hack on to side of sysctl," and
i've thought about this idea for a couple of days now and it does seem
very attractive. of course, it means going through another whole
design phase... but it seems worthwhile.
* I think other NetBSD API people probably should buy in, whichever
way you go.
hmmm, "NetBSD API people"...