Subject: Re: LFS frailty vs. datestamping [Was Re: /dev/clock pseudodevice]
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/30/2001 02:23:37
>> Sure, it moves blocks around. So what.
> 1. "So what" kind of sidesteps the issue, don't you think?
I don't think so, unless I've misunderstood what "the issue" is. What
is inherently fragile about moving data around? I do it regularly on
FFS with no visible problem.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B