Subject: re: /usr/include/machine
To: Chris Gilbert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: matthew green <email@example.com>
Date: 07/13/2001 13:46:57
On Thursday 12 July 2001 6:16 pm, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:15:32 -0700,
> Matt Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> > I disagree. arm is currently the test case and leaving it as is will
> > cause us to find the problems and address them.
> If everything worked fine, it was ok.
> But the change breaks "make build" on even arm port.
> So, it should be backed out, at least until the problem is solved.
> Shouldn't it?
I disagree, I've heard no complaints about it yet (I was not complaining I
i think it is wrong for any port to be intentionally left in a broken
state for more than a few days. i haven't complained because i haven't
had any need to upgrade my sharks lately, but i was hoping to do it
out the `dnard' tree next. ;)