Subject: Re: g/c mountcompatnames ?
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jaromír <email@example.com>
Date: 06/27/2001 09:56:35
Bill Studenmund wrote:
> I think this might be the first time we drop a COMPAT option. I'm not sure
> if that's a good thing to do.
> How is it becoming a maintenance problem - it's not changing, is it?
It is changing. It feels ... wrong to add a new filesystem and not update
list of filesystems in mountcompatnames, even through that list is obsolete.
Also, due to how current vfs_sysctl() works, that list has to be updated
and kept in sync and order with CTL_VFS_NAMES in order to support fs sysctls.
That stuff is dead weight. It's no longer possible to test if it's
actually still working. It's been dead for like 7 years now (since NetBSD 1.0).
Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org> http://www.ics.muni.cz/~dolecek/
NetBSD - just plain best OS! -=*=- Got spare MCA cards or docs? Hand me them!